Going deeper
Here's the part that earns the rest.
A catalog like this is the easiest thing in the world to fake. Anyone can pile up a stack of clever-sounding shapes and call it a theory of everything. The only thing that tells you a collection is real is whether anything ever gets thrown out of it.
So — straight with you. Some of these shapes have held up under everything I've thrown at them. Most are still on probation: promising, not proven, getting checked against one more case before I'll lean on them. And some got cut. They looked good, and they didn't hold.
I'll name two I dropped, because the dropped ones are the whole proof. There was one about things swinging back and forth — gathering toward the center, breaking apart, gathering again — that I was sure of, right up until I tried to pin down when it swings and found there's no rhythm to it at all. It's not a pattern. It's just a thing that sometimes happens. Gone. There was another about how a system sorts signal from noise that looked gorgeous in living things and then quietly meant nothing the moment I carried it out of biology. Gone too.
That's the whole posture. The list isn't finished, and it isn't supposed to be — new shapes come in as candidates, earn their way up or wash out, and the catalog keeps breathing. A thing that only ever grows, that never once loses a member, isn't a science. It's a drawer full of souvenirs.
And once you've got a living catalog like that — shapes that keep surviving, across everything, getting tested and pruned — you start to wonder what it would mean to lay them all out together. Something larger seems to be forming in there. I want to end by pointing at it. Carefully.